Pathway & routing
Drug class, intended route and indication, and the CDER-vs-CBER routing decision. Biologics, gene therapy, and cell therapy are routed to CBER here — a routing error fixed at Gate 1 avoids a wrong-center detour later.
INDBridge · How it works
Specialist Claude agents draft every artifact in an IND submission — CMC, nonclinical, clinical, and the eCTD modules. A named regulatory lead e-signs at nine human Gates. A tamper-evident hash chain records every step. The result is speed without a loss of rigor — first-submission timelines measured in weeks, with each milestone still signed by a person and verifiable by an inspector.
Human-in-the-loop
The platform halts at each gate until a named regulatory lead e-signs with WebAuthn 2FA. Each sign-off produces a manifest binding signer, timestamp, intent, and the SHA-256 of the exact artifact reviewed — and lands in the hash-chained audit. Why it matters: an FDA decision is only as defensible as the human accountability behind it, and these nine gates are that accountability, recorded mechanically.
Drug class, intended route and indication, and the CDER-vs-CBER routing decision. Biologics, gene therapy, and cell therapy are routed to CBER here — a routing error fixed at Gate 1 avoids a wrong-center detour later.
The FDA Q-list, CMC briefing, and Pre-IND meeting package, when a Pre-IND meeting is used to align with the agency before filing.
Drug substance and drug product modules per ICH Q-series — specification, manufacturing process, batch analysis, stability, container closure; ICH Q5A-Q5E for biologics.
Pharmacology, ADME, and toxicology, with the iPSP and the ICH M3(R2) / S-series assessments. A safety-bearing gate.
The ICH M11 machine-readable protocol, the DEPICT Diversity Action Plan, Project Optimus dose-optimization for oncology, and DCT elements.
The Investigator Brochure and FDA forms (1571, 1572, 3674, 3454/3455, 3500A, 356h) reviewed together before assembly.
A passing Refuse-to-File pre-check and an eCTD package validated against FDA technical conformance before anything is transmitted.
Per-Sub-customer S/MIME cert provisioning confirmed and the FDA ESG envelope prepared, reconciled before release.
The final go / no-go to transmit over the FDA ESG (AS2 + S/MIME + WebTrader). No agent ever submits to FDA without this explicit signed release.
The specialist-agent pipeline
Each agent is narrow and accountable. A single Orchestrator agent dispatches them, owns submission state, and owns the audit trail. Agents draft and analyze; humans decide at the gates.
The candidate is classified by intended route and indication — small molecule, biologic, gene therapy, cell therapy — and routed to CDER or CBER, with the Pre-IND meeting package prepared.
Why it matters · RA gets a defensible starting point and an early routing catch.
CMC agents draft the Module 3 drug-substance and drug-product modules per ICH Q-series; nonclinical agents draft pharmacology, ADME, and toxicology per the ICH M3(R2) / S-series, with the iPSP.
Why it matters · CMC and nonclinical SMEs review complete drafts with gap analysis.
The clinical agent drafts the ICH M11 machine-readable protocol with the DEPICT Diversity Action Plan, Project Optimus dose optimization, and the Investigator Brochure assembled from CMC, nonclinical, and clinical inputs.
Why it matters · The clinical lead sees a protocol built day-one for the 2024-2026 FDA wave.
FDA forms are filled, the eCTD package is built, and the Refuse-to-File analyzer runs FDA's RTF rules deterministically with eCTD technical-conformance validation before transmission.
Why it matters · QA sees the RTF verdict before the submission is transmitted.
The Submission Orchestrator transmits over the FDA ESG (AS2 + S/MIME + WebTrader), polls the receipt, and tracks the 30-day review clock from the MDN.
Why it matters · RA gets the 30-day clock and cliff alerts from real FDA acknowledgements.
First-of-kind capabilities
These are the capabilities a skeptical RA or QA reviewer should probe hardest. Each is stated as a concrete mechanism and what it buys the regulatory team.
Source-of-truth doctrine
Regulatory citations, ICH guidance references, and product-specific facts are looked up against live FDA / ICH sources at draft time. The query, the result hash, and the result snapshot are logged. An agent that cannot ground a claim refuses to emit it.
Why it matters · No fabricated regulatory citation can ever enter a submission.
AI provenance
Every agent run records its tool calls, the sources it grounded against, and token telemetry. The reasoning path is reconstructable after the fact.
Why it matters · An inspector can reconstruct exactly what each agent did and why.
Mock-FDA rehearsal
A mock FDA ESG (AS2 + WebTrader) emulates the agency's response surface — the MDN and acknowledgement receipts. The first real submission is effectively the second; the first run is a full rehearsal.
Why it matters · The team meets failure modes in rehearsal, not on the real clock.
Refuse-to-File analyzer
The Refuse-to-File analyzer runs FDA's RTF rules before transmission, alongside eCTD technical-conformance validation. The verdict is deterministic, not a model guess.
Why it matters · QA predicts a clean filing before the package is transmitted.
eCTD assembly
FDA forms are filled and the eCTD package is built and validated, with per-Sub-customer S/MIME certs provisioned for the FDA ESG envelope.
Why it matters · RA sees a conformant eCTD package, not a hand-wave.
180-day cliff alerting
The Clinical Hold has its own 30-day clock; INDBridge also tracks 7-day SUSAR and 15-day serious-unexpected reporting per 21 CFR 312.32. Alerts fire at T-60 / 30 / 14 / 7 / 3 / 1 with escalation, so a deadline is never silently missed.
Why it matters · The most expensive failures — a missed hold response or safety report — are engineered out.
See it on a live workspace
We will run a candidate through classification, CMC and nonclinical authoring, the ICH M11 protocol, the Refuse-to-File pre-check, and a mock-FDA rehearsal — and show you the audit chain and tool-use traces behind every step.